Management
Back to top
Tears that have a better chance of healing, that is circumferential tears in the red zone, should be repaired. It’s a bit much to go into the various methods here, but basically this is done via stitching or by using special harpooning devices, and the surgeon is likely to have his favourite technique. These days, the stitches or devices are likely to be bio-absorbable, so they just get absorbed over time and leave no trace. The surgeon may feel the need to trim off bits that are unlikely to heal, may roughen the contact edges or poke small holes in the meniscus to improve bleeding, and may use biologic glues to make the torn edges sticky and help to hold them together. Stem cell preparations may also be used to encourage cellular healing.
Clearly, this is more of a challenge than removing the torn part, but tell me, who wants to choose an option that is more likely to progress to painful arthritis? There is a critical difference in the length and complexity of rehabilitation of a repair compared to a partial meniscectomy and this is a very important issue. Sports players, in particular, are keen to get back to their sport, and may dismiss the option of a repair, because the rehabilitation may take several months longer than a partial meniscectomy. In my opinion this is a tragedy because the long term outcome of a meniscectomy is likely to be considerably worse than after a successful meniscus repair.
So what happens to those tears that have a poor chance of healing? Here, the surgeon has a dilemma. Most surgeons would probably trim away the loose bits, using their judgement as to how much to trim and how much to retain. It would be termed a trimming of the meniscus if it was a small trim, and a partial meniscectomy if it was a larger trim.
Now another big problem is that of complex tears, where the meniscus is torn in more than one direction and area, and full reduction and repair is impossible. The principle here would be to focus on retaining at least the outer rim, which is more critical than the inner part of the meniscus when it comes to protecting the joint from arthritis. This might be called a sub-total meniscectomy. If even this is impossible and the whole meniscus had to be removed the procedure would be called a total meniscectomy, which is something of a disaster for the patient from the point of view of eventual arthritis.
Before we move on, let’s look briefly at avulsions. A major issue is that the avulsion may be missed during arthroscopy, and the meniscus declared to be normal. An experienced surgeon will know to carefully probe the rims and tug at the roots. The avulsion of the medial meniscus rim can be relatively easily repaired with stitches, but root and popliteal avulsions may be a surgical challenge even to an expert surgeon.
So these are the other reasons why I caution people to be sure that their surgeon is experienced. The surgeon must feel confident to perform a repair on both tears and avulsions, and to be confident about what must be trimmed and what can be retained, and what risk the patient carries after surgery for later complications.
Before we close, there are four further management options that we must discuss, so that you have a complete overview. The first of the surgical options is a meniscus transplantation, the second is a meniscus scaffold and the third is a realignment osteotomy. A relevant non-surgical option related to an osteotomy is an unloader brace.
Meniscus transplant may be recommended in the younger patient who has had a total meniscectomy and in whom the joint surfaces are still in good shape. The whole meniscus and a bit of the tibia bone is transplanted from a donor, and the meniscus stitched into place while the bone is seated into a prepared hole in the recipient bone. It is not a procedure to be lightly undertaken because of the usual issues associated with transplants, such as rejection and the transmission of infective agents such as HIV, but in experienced units the patient may have a good outcome.
A meniscus scaffold is a bio-engineered material, in a wedge shape, that is trimmed and sewn into place where there is a large defect in the meniscus. The idea is that the cells can grow into the scaffold and replicate, and produce matrix and fibres with sufficient resilience to offer some protection to the joint cartilage.
A realignment osteotomy is a procedure where one or other or both of the long bones are cut and fixed at a new angulation, so that the load is shifted over to the good side and the affected meniscus area is relieved of the stresses that would otherwise damage the joint surface.
Angulation may also be obtained by the wearing of an unloader brace, which again relieves the stresses on the joint cartilage and offers protection to the affected area while decisions are being made about future management.
So that is the topic of the meniscus in a nutshell. I do hope that this presentation has helped to put all the many issues into some kind of perspective for you. Thank you for listening.
Further reading:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC155528/