1991 - The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome

strover02.png

Dr Sheila Strover

Clinical Editor

Dr Sheila Strover is the Founder and previous Clinical Editor of the KNEEguru website.Her medical studies were completed at the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa - BSc(Hons) (1968) and MBBCh (1974). She emigrated to the United Kingdom in 1983 and worked as an anaesthetist (anaesthesio…

January 1, 1991

An 'interpretation' of a 1991 publication, describing how to recognise the early stages of internal scarring causing the patellar to pull down into an 'infera' position.

The early diagnosis and treatment of developmental patella infera syndrome.

Noyes FR, Wojtys EM, and Marshall MT. Clin Orthop Rel Res 265:241-252, 1991.

This is the editor's interpretation of a paper published in the orthopaedic literature in 1991 - our attempt to make relevant medical articles accessible to lay readers. If you wish to read the original it is easy to ask your librarian to obtain a reprint for you from any medical library.

This paper distinguishes between -

  • developmental patella infera - where the patella is moving down into a lower position due to adhesions and scarring, but which situation is still potentially reversible.

  • permanent patella infera - where the situation is effectively irreversible, and salvage procedures can only try to improve the mechanics, not restore them.

It introduces the concept of using serial lateral (from the side) X-rays at 60 degrees of knee flexion to detect and monitor the situation of the patella in high risk cases.

Using a control group of 51 patients with minor knee problems and no prior surgical procedure on the knee nor any period of immobilisation, the authors established in their population the normal range of vertical height of the patella above the tibial plateau. They also compared the two knees of each patient as well as the reliability of serial measurements in the same patient.

They found, using three different measurement methods, that there was essentially no difference in the patellar height ratios between right and left knees (only 11-15%), but there was a large variation in the ratios from one individual to another.

Having established this baseline, they followed a series of five patients who had developed patella infera during the rehabilitation period or within six months, and whose patellar height ratio was decreased by at least 11-15%. The authors felt that in all cases they were still in the transient ('developmental') stage and that the patella infera was still amenable to surgical restoration.

They went on to detail the five case histories which make very interesting reading:

They found that adaptive shortening of the patellar tendon may occur within a very short period of time if the transient stage was not recognised and treated immediately. Numerous physical signs were present which should have alerted the clinicians to the development of developmental patella infera -

They drew attention to the need to distinguish this from the syndrome of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (which is a syndrome where excessive pain, out of proportion to the findings, is association with other signs and symptoms due to nervous system changes - funny feelings in the skin, funny coloured blotches etcetera)..

The authors found that in the early development of patella infera the vertical height ratios between the two knees may differ by only a few millimetres. A difference greater than 15% may be considered abnormal. A second X-ray needs to be taken a week or two later to measure any further descent of the patella. The ratio must be compared to the opposite knee or a pre operative X-ray.

The key message is that patients with developing arthrofibrosis and early patella infera may often avoid surgey by participating in a closely supervised rehabilitation programme: